No gear placement in this one. Training notes only, written from my own log. Nothing here is medical or coaching advice — it's what worked for one person across one block.
Four lifting days and two conditioning days sounds like six days of training. It isn't. It's four days of training and two days of deciding whether the next lift is going to happen.
I've run this week badly twice. Both times the conditioning was good on its own terms and both times the lifting flattened out by week five. The third attempt held for a full eight weeks, and the difference wasn't the conditioning work itself — it was where it sat and how it was capped.
The week that held
- Monday LIFT · LOWER, HIP-DOMINANT
- Tuesday LIFT · UPPER, PUSH-LED
- Wednesday EMOM · 20 MIN
- Thursday LIFT · LOWER, KNEE-DOMINANT
- Friday LIFT · UPPER, PULL-LED
- Saturday EMOM · 24 MIN
- Sunday OFF
Three things make that work, and all three are constraints rather than additions.
1. Conditioning never precedes a lower day
Wednesday's session sits between two upper-led days and in front of Thursday's knee-dominant lift — one full day of separation from Monday's hinge, and Thursday's lift is a different pattern. Saturday sits in front of the rest day. The two conditioning slots are the two places in the week where fatigue can't land on a hinge.
The failed versions of this week had conditioning on Sunday, which meant Monday's hinge was always the session paying for it. The log showed it clearly: top-set load stalled from week five on, and I kept blaming the programme.
2. EMOM, not AMRAP
This is the part I'd argue with anyone about. AMRAP is the honest expression of "go as hard as you can for X minutes", and on a conditioning day sitting inside a lifting week, that's exactly the wrong instruction. AMRAP has no ceiling, so the only thing capping the session is how much you're willing to suffer — and on a good day that's quite a lot, which is how a Wednesday wrecks a Thursday.
EMOM caps it structurally. Every minute on the minute, a fixed amount of work, and the reward for being fit is more rest, not more volume. That's the behaviour you want from a conditioning slot that has to coexist with strength work. The round ends when the work is done; the clock does the rest.
In practice: Wednesday ran 20 one-minute intervals, Saturday ran 24. Work per interval was set so that week one finished each round with roughly 20 seconds left. If a round ran to the whistle twice in a session, the load came down the next week rather than the session running longer.
3. Two movements per EMOM, alternating
Alternating minutes — swings on the odds, burpees on the evens, or a row interval against a carry. Two reasons. Local fatigue gets a minute to clear, which keeps the output honest instead of degrading into a slow grind. And the session stays legible in the log: eight rounds of each at a known load, which is a number you can progress.
- Format EMOM · 20 MIN
- Odd minutes KB SWING · 12 × 53 LB
- Even minutes BURPEE · 8
- Rounds completed 20 / 20
- Rounds to the whistle 1
What actually went up
Over eight weeks, swing load went 44 lb to 53 lb at the same rep count, and the number of rounds finishing with time to spare improved across both slots. More to the point, the lifting didn't stall — Monday's hinge progressed every week except week 7, which was a travel week.
That's the whole claim. Conditioning that progresses slowly and never costs you a lifting session is worth more over a block than conditioning that feels impressive on Wednesday and quietly removes Thursday.
If you lift five days
Cut to one conditioning slot and put it in front of the rest day. Two slots in a five-day lifting week is six and a half days of work with no recovery day, and the thing that breaks won't be your motivation — it'll be the hinge.
Splitz
EMOM blocks in Splitz end the interval when you mark the round done, so rest-per-round is recorded instead of guessed. That's the number this whole post turns on.
Join the beta list →